www.亚洲一二三-www.尤物.com-www.自拍偷拍-www97超碰-WWW97干-www97视频

【?????? ???? ????】Enter to watch online.That viral black plastic kitchen utensil study was overblown thanks to a simple math mistake.

If TikTok had you rushing to throw away your black plastic kitchen utensils,?????? ???? ???? rest assuredthatthose tools weren't as bad as they seemed.

A study went viral in November — as much as any study can go viral — that suggested black plastic kitchen utensils wereshedlots of poison into our food thanks to a flame retardant carried over from recycled electronics that helped make the plastic tools. However, there was a big problem in the study that came down to simple math, as Canada's National Post reported.

In short, the study looked to measure the median amount a flame retardant toxin might get out of black plastic spatulas during cooking. The study found that figure was 34,700 nanograms per day, which, the study noted, was close to the EPA limit of 42,000. That, in part sparked lots of panic all over TikTok and in major publications about how black plastic cookingutensils were slowly poisoning everyone. I cannot tell you how many posts I saw online of folks throwing away their utensils or telling others to do so.


You May Also Like

However, the study made a really simple math error, one that may have made its findings sound more severe than they should. The National Postreported that the study calculated that EPA limit by multiplying 7,000 — the amount of nanograms of the toxin per kilogram of bodyweight — by 60, to get the limit for a 60-kilogram (132 pound) person per day. That's how they got 42,000. But 60 multiplied by 7,000 is, in fact, 420,000 — meaning the exposure is actually less than one-tenth the limit.

Mashable Trend Report Decode what’s viral, what’s next, and what it all means. Sign up for Mashable’s weekly Trend Report newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

Now that's not to say folks want any of that toxin leeching into their food. Zero would be a great figure. But as YouTube's favorite science nerd, Hank Green, pointed out on Bluesky "that paper on black plastic was a bit blown out of proportion by a simple math error."

Hey, so it turns out that paper on black plastic was a bit blown out of proportion by a simple math error. nationalpost.com/news/canada/...

[image or embed]

— Hank Green (@hankgreen.bsky.social) December 16, 2024 at 12:09 AM

Toxic-Free Future, an advocacy group that carried out the study, has said that while there was a mistake it does not affect the overall findings.

"As noted in the published correction, this comparison was not a major point of the study and the findings, conclusions, and recommendations are unaffected by this correction," the group wrote on Bluesky.

So you might want to still be wary of black plastic — but all those headlines and TikToks might've been a bit misleading.

Latest Articles

Recent Articles

Editor's Picks

Fan Articles

主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲成a片 | 午夜不卡av | 天美免费在线传煤mv | 人人超碰97狠狠摸 | 成人午夜A片 | 日韩AV一二三 | 国产嫖妓自拍 | 成人毛片在线免费观看 | 日韩在线欧美 | 日韩美女在线播放 | 日韩国产精品 | 免费成人黄色 | 欧美日韩在线看 | 成人A片视频 | 亚洲第一视频网站 | 色情午夜码一区二区 | 夜间福利高清视频 | 日本中文字幕有码 | 97干在线视频 | 国产午夜手机精彩视频 | 无码高清不卡在线 | 天天操夜夜操 | 国产113页| 成人精品视频免费 | 日韩精品三区四区 | 91国内| 色老大综合| 免费福利视频导航 | 婷婷五月影院 | 人人操操人人 | 欧美高清三区 | 综合成人 | 深爱五月网 | 午夜成人免费在线观看 | 国产精品宾馆精品酒店 | 精品自拍第一页 | 日韩电影在线观看一区 | 亚洲国产黄色 | 午夜成人高清 | 日韩欧美亚洲国产精品 | 日韩精品激情在线播放 |